Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences) ; (12): 707-715, 2023.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-982340

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES@#Gram-positive cocci is the main pathogen responsible for early infection after liver transplantation (LT), posing a huge threat to the prognosis of liver transplant recipients. This study aims to analyze the distribution and drug resistance of Gram-positive cocci, the risk factors for infections and efficacy of antibiotics within 2 months after LT, and to guide the prevention and treatment of these infections.@*METHODS@#In this study, data of pathogenic bacteria distribution, drug resistance and therapeutic efficacy were collected from 39 Gram-positive cocci infections among 256 patients who received liver transplantation from donation after citizens' death in the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January 2019 to July 2022, and risk factors for Gram-positive cocci infection were analyzed.@*RESULTS@#Enterococcus faecium was the dominant pathogenic bacteria (33/51, 64.7%), followed by Enterococcus faecalis (11/51, 21.6%). The most common sites of infection were abdominal cavity/biliary tract (13/256, 5.1%) and urinary tract (10/256, 3.9%). Fifty (98%) of the 51 Gram-positive cocci infections occurred within 1 month after LT. The most sensitive drugs to Gram-positive cocci were teicoplanin, tigecycline, linezolid and vancomycin. Vancomycin was not used in all patients, considering its nephrotoxicity. Vancomycin was not administered to all patients in view of its nephrotoxicity.There was no significant difference between the efficacy of daptomycin and teicoplanin in the prevention of cocci infection (P>0.05). Univariate analysis indicated that preoperative Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score >25 (P=0.005), intraoperative red blood cell infusion ≥12 U (P=0.013) and exposure to more than 2 intravenous antibiotics post-LT (P=0.003) were related to Gram-positive cocci infections. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative MELD score >25 (OR=2.378, 95% CI 1.124 to 5.032, P=0.024) and intraoperative red blood cell transfusion ≥ 12 U (OR=2.757, 95% CI 1.227 to 6.195, P=0.014) were independent risk factors for Gram-positive cocci infections after LT. Postoperative Gram-positive cocci infections were reduced in LT recipients exposing to more than two intravenous antibiotics post-LT (OR=0.269, 95% CI 0.121 to 0.598, P=0.001).@*CONCLUSIONS@#Gram-positive cocci infections occurring early after liver transplantation were dominated by Enterococcus faecalis infections at the abdominal/biliary tract and urinary tract. Teicoplanin, tigecycline and linezolid were anti-cocci sensitive drugs. Daptomycin and teicoplanin were equally effective in preventing cocci infections due to Gram-positive cocci. Patients with high preoperative MELD score and massive intraoperative red blood cell transfusion were more likely to suffer Gram-positive cocci infection after surgery. Postoperative Gram-positive cocci infections were reduced in recipients exposing to more than two intravenous antibiotics post-LT.


Subject(s)
Humans , Daptomycin/therapeutic use , Linezolid/therapeutic use , Teicoplanin/therapeutic use , Gram-Positive Cocci , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Tigecycline/therapeutic use , End Stage Liver Disease/drug therapy , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Severity of Illness Index , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Vancomycin/therapeutic use , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
2.
Actual. SIDA. infectol ; 30(110): 28-32, 20220000.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1413667

ABSTRACT

La aparición de cepas de enterococos resistentes a daptomicina es un tema de preocupación clínica y epidemiológica en años recientes. Se presenta el caso de un paciente de 50 años con antecedente de artritis reumatoide e inmunosupresión crónica hospitalizado en contexto de neumonía viral por COVID-19, con sobreinfección bacteriana y choque séptico, en quien se documentó en tres oportunidades diferentes aislamientos de Enterococcus faecium vancomicino-resistente VAN A y B con falla terapéutica a daptomicina, por deterioro clínico y persistencia de hemocultivos positivos. Se inició manejo con linezolid con control de la infección, negativización de hemocultivos y evolución clínica satisfactoria. Se realiza reporte del presente caso para dar a conocer la aparición de enterococos resistentes a daptomicina, la cual es una creciente preocupación epidemiológica, con el fin de realizar identificación temprana, prevenir falla terapéutica y poder conocer la epidemiología local


n recent years, the emergence of daptomycin-resistant enterococcus strains is a growing clinical and epidemio-logical topic of concern. We report the case of a 50 year old patient with an antecedent of rheumatoid arthritis and chronic immunosuppression hospitalized in the con-text of COVID-19 pneumonia with bacterial co-infection and septic shock in which a three different moments an isolate of a "vancomycin-resistant enterococcus faecium"(VRE) Van A and B that presented therapeutic failure with daptomycin was documented after clinical deterioration and persistence of positive blood cultures. Linezolid was initiated, with clinical recovery and negativization of blood cultures following the change in antibiotic treatment. This case is reported in order to expose the ever growing con-cern of daptomycin-resistant enterococcus strains in or-der to prevent therapeutic failure, make early identifica-tion and get to know the local epidemiological status.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Enterococcus faecium , Bacteremia/diagnosis , Daptomycin/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Bacterial
3.
Rev. chil. infectol ; 37(1): 19-22, feb. 2020. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1092717

ABSTRACT

Resumen Introducción: Vancomicina ha sido considerada como el tratamiento de elección en especial para Staphylococcus aureus resistente a meticilina (SARM); pero su escasa penetración tisular, su toxicidad renal y el requerir monitoreo de su dosis, plantean la necesidad de nuevas alternativas de tratamiento, como daptomicina. Objetivos: Analizar la seguridad y efectividad de daptomicina en niños. Pacientes y Métodos: Se incluyeron, retrospectivamente, niños con infecciones microbiológicamente documentadas, tratados con daptomicina. Resultados: Las infecciones más frecuentes fueron endocarditis en 9 (32%), sepsis de la comunidad en 4 (14%), bacteriemia en 7 (asociada a catéter en 3) (25%), osteomielitis en 3 (10%), peritonitis asociada a diálisis en 3 (10%) y tromboflebitis supurativa en 2 pacientes (7%). Staphylococcus aureus resistente a meticilina fue el patógeno más común en 18 pacientes (64%), Daptomicina fue indicada por el fracaso del tratamiento convencional en 17 (61%), y la toxicidad o intolerancia a vancomicina en 11 pacientes (39%). La duración media de tratamiento fue de 19 días (RIC 95% 7-42 días). Cuatro pacientes (14%) completaron tratamiento ambulatorio. Tuvieron respuesta favorable 22 pacientes (79%) Se reportaron eventos adversos en tres pacientes: dos elevaciones de creatina-fosfocinasa) y una erupción cutánea grave. Conclusiones: Daptomicina demostró una eficacia y seguridad favorables en esta población pediátrica.


Abstract Background: Vancomycin has been considered the treatment of choice especially for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections; but its poor tissue penetration, renal toxicity, and requiring of dosages monitoring, raises the need for new treatment alternatives such as daptomycin. Aims: To analyze the safety and effectiveness of daptomycin in children. Methods: Children with microbiologically documented infections treated with daptomycin were retrospectively included. Results: The most frequent infections were endocarditis in 9 (32%), sepsis in 4 (14%), bacteremia in 7 (associated with catheter in 3) (25%), osteomyelitis in 3 (10%), peritonitis associated with dialysis in 3 (10%) and suppurative thrombophlebitis in 2 patients (p) (7%). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen in 18 patients (64%). The indications for daptomycin were due to the failure of conventional treatment in 17 (61%), and the toxicity or intolerance to vancomycin in 11 patients (39%). The average duration of treatment was 19 days (95% ICR 7-42 days). Four patients (14%) completed outpatient treatment, 22 patients had a favorable response (79%). Adverse events were reported in 3 patients (2 creatinine-phosfo-kinase increase) and in one severe skin rash. Conclusions: Daptomycin demonstrated a favorable efficacy and safety in this pediatric population.


Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Daptomycin/therapeutic use , Hospitals, Pediatric/statistics & numerical data , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
4.
Rev. bras. oftalmol ; 78(5): 300-303, Sept.-Oct. 2019. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1042389

ABSTRACT

Resumo Objetivo: A blefarite é uma das condições mais comumente encontradas na prática oftalmológica e se constitui em uma causa frequente de irritação e desconforto ocular. Por ser uma doença de difícil tratamento, os autores buscaram compreender melhor a epidemiologia, etiologia, apresentações clínicas, tratamento e evolução de seus pacientes, visando maior sucesso terapêutico. Métodos: Foram avaliados retrospectivamente e transversalmente o prontuário de 124 pacientes do Centro de Oftalmologia Tadeu Cvintal, os quais apresentavam blefarite e foram submetidos à classificação de gravidade e coleta de secreções palpebrais para cultura bacteriana e antibiograma. Resultados: A media da idade dos pacientes foi de 67,4 anos, o sexo feminino foi responsável por 70 (56,4%) casos e o masculino por 54 (43,5%). Quanto à gravidade da doença, constatou-se 71 casos de blefarite leve (56,8%), 52 (41,6%) com intensidade moderada e 2 (1,6%) casos graves. Avaliando o seguimento do tratamento da doença, foi observado que 103 (82,4%) pacientes não retornaram para avaliar o resultado do tratamento e apenas 22 (17,6%) retornaram. Em relação às culturas realizadas, 82 (66,1%) não apresentaram crescimento microbiano. Dentre as 42 (33,8%) amostras positivas, os Staphylococcus coagulase negativo foram os mais prevalentes, sobretudo os Staphylococcus epidermidis, responsável por 35 (83,3%) delas. Quanto à sensibilidade aos antibióticos, os agentes de nossa amostra demonstraram maior resistência à Penicilina, Eritromicina e Ciprofloxacino e 100% de sensibilidade à Linezolida, Vancomicina e Daptomicina. Conclusão: Conhecendo melhor as características epidemiológicas da blefarite e a sensibilidade antimicrobiana das bactérias envolvidas, é possível oferecer tratamentos mais eficazes.


Abstract Objective: Blepharitis is one of the most commonly encountered conditions in ophthalmic practice and is a frequent cause of eye irritation and discomfort. Being a difficult to treat disease, the authors sought to better understand the epidemiology, etiology, clinical presentations, treatment and evolution of their patients, aiming at greater therapeutic success. Methods: The medical records of 124 patients of Centro de Oftalmologia Tadeu Cvintal who had blepharitis were retrospectively and cross-sectionally evaluated and underwent severity classification and collection of eyelid secretions for bacterial culture and antibiogram. Results: The mean age of the patients was 67.4 years, females accounted for 70 (56.4%) cases and males for 54 (43.5%). Regarding the severity of the disease, there were 71 cases of mild blepharitis (56.8%), 52 (41.6%) with moderate intensity and 2 (1.6%) severe cases. Evaluating the follow-up of treatment of the disease, it was observed that 103 (82.4%) patients did not return to evaluate the treatment outcome and only 22 (17.6%) returned. In respect of the cultures performed, 82 (66.1%) did not show microbial growth. Among the 42 (33.8%) positive samples, coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most prevalent, especially Staphylococcus epidermidis, responsible for 35 (83.3%) of them. As for antibiotic sensitivity, the agents in our sample showed greater resistance to Penicillin, Erythromycin and Ciprofloxacin and 100% sensitivity to Linezolid, Vancomycin and Daptomycin. Conclusion: By better understanding the epidemiological characteristics of blepharitis and the antimicrobial sensitivity of the bacteria involved, it is possible to offer more effective treatments.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blepharitis/etiology , Blepharitis/drug therapy , Blepharitis/epidemiology , Vancomycin/therapeutic use , Daptomycin/therapeutic use , Linezolid/therapeutic use , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Medical Records , Cross-Sectional Studies , Retrospective Studies , Culture Techniques
5.
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 23(3): 191-196, May-June 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1019553

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Backgroud: Daptomycin has been used in bone and joint infections (BJI) and prosthesis joint infections (PJI) considering spectrum of activity and biofilm penetration. However, the current experience is based on case reports, case series, cohorts, and international surveys. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate studies about daptomycin treatment efficacy in BJI/PJI compared to other antibiotic regimens. Methods: PubMed, LILACS, Scielo and Web of Science databases were searched for articles about daptomycin and treatment of BJI and PJI from inception to March 2018. Inclusion criteria were any published researches that included patients with BJI treated with daptomycin. Diagnosis of BJI was based on clinical, laboratory and radiological findings according to IDSA guidelines. Results: From 5107 articles, 12 articles were included. Only three studies described the outcomes of patients with BJI treated with daptomycin with comparator regimen (vancomycin, teicoplanin and oxacillin). Studies presented large heterogeneity regarding device related infections, surgical procedures, and daptomycin regimens (varied from 4 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg). A total of 299 patients have been included in all studies (184 infections associated with orthopedic disposal and 115 osteomyelitis/septic arthritis). Two hundred and thirty-three patients were treated with daptomycin. The clinical cure rates on device related and non-device related infections (i.e. osteomyelitis) were 70% and 78%, respectively. Compared to all regimens evaluated, daptomycin group outcomes were non-inferior. Conclusion: Although a randomized clinical trial is needed, this systematic review tends to support daptomycin usage for bone and joint infections.


Subject(s)
Humans , Bone Diseases/drug therapy , Prosthesis-Related Infections/drug therapy , Daptomycin/therapeutic use , Joint Diseases/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Osteomyelitis/drug therapy , Arthritis, Infectious/drug therapy , Joint Prosthesis/adverse effects
6.
Actual. SIDA. infectol ; 22(85): 53-63, set.2014.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-780405

ABSTRACT

Las infecciones por Staphylococcus aureus meticilino resistente adquirido en la comunidad (SAMR-AC) constituyen un problema emergente debido a su elevada virulencia y gran capacidad de diseminación. Para las infecciones invasivas, las recomendaciones publicadas sugieren vancomicina como droga de elección. Sin embargo, no está claro si otras alternativas pudieran ser mejores en determinadas situaciones, o si el uso de combinaciones de antibióticos sería beneficioso. No se han realizado trabajos que sugieran que alguna alternativa terapéutica sea preferible a otra para el tratamiento de pacientes con infecciones invasivas por SAMR-AC, por lo que las decisiones a tomar se basan en la extrapolación de datos de estudios realizados en otros contextos o en la opinión de expertos. Por tal motivo, se presenta esta revisión, con el objeto de poner en manos de los infectólogos y otros especialistas la evidencia disponible, a fin de intentar encontrar las mejores alternativas de tratamiento para estas infecciones...


Infections caused to community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) is an emerging problem due to its high virulence and large capacity of spread. For invasive infections, published recommendations suggest vancomycin as the drug of choice. However, it is unclear whether other alternatives might be better in certain situations, or if the use of combinations of antibiotics would be beneficial. No studies has been done to suggest that any therapeutic alternative is better than another for the treatment of patients with invasive CA-MRSA infections, so the decisions you make are based on extrapolation of data from studies in other contexts or expert opinion. Therefore, this review is presented, in order to put in the hands of infectologist and others specialists the available evidence, in order to find the best treatmente options for these infections...


Subject(s)
Humans , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Clindamycin/pharmacology , Daptomycin/therapeutic use , Morbidity Surveys , Observational Studies as Topic , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/pathogenicity , Vancomycin/therapeutic use
7.
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 17(6): 647-653, Nov.-Dec. 2013. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-696964

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To collect data about non-controlled prescribing use of daptomycin and its impact among Brazilian patients with serious Gram positive bacterial infection, as well as the efficacy and safety outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a multi-center, retrospective, non-interventional registry (August 01, 2009 to June 30, 2011) to collect data on 120 patients (44 patients in the first year and 76 patients in the second year) who had received at least one dose of commercial daptomycin in Brazil for the treatment of serious Gram-positive bacterial infection. RESULTS: Right-sided endocarditis (15.8%), complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTI)wound (15.0%) and bacteremia-catheter-related (14.2%) were the most frequent primary infections; lung (21.7%) was the most common site for infection. Daptomycin was used empirically in 76 (63.3%) patients, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was the most common suspected pathogen (86.1%). 82.5% of the cultures were obtained prior to or shortly after initiation of daptomycin therapy. Staphylococcus spp. - coagulase negative, MRSA, and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus were the most frequently identified pathogens (23.8%, 23.8% and 12.5%, respectively). The most common daptomycin dose administered for bacteremia and cSSTI was 6 mg/kg (30.6%) and 4 mg/kg (51.7%), respectively. The median duration of inpatient daptomycin therapy was 14 days. Most patients (57.1%) did not receive daptomycin while in intensive care unit. Carbapenem (22.5%) was the most commonly used antibiotic concomitantly. The patients showed clinical improvement after two days (median) following the start of daptomycin therapy. The clinical success rate was 80.8% and the overall rate of treatment failure was 10.8%. The main reasons for daptomycin discontinuation were successful end of therapy (75.8%), switched therapy (11.7%), and treatment failure (4.2%). Daptomycin demonstrated a favorable safety and tolerability profile regardless of treatment duration. CONCLUSIONS: Daptomycin had a relevant role in the treatment of Gram-positive infections in the clinical practice setting in Brazil.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Daptomycin/therapeutic use , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Brazil , Daptomycin/adverse effects , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
8.
Rev. chil. infectol ; 29(2): 127-131, abr. 2012. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-627223

ABSTRACT

Daptomycin recently made available in Chile, belongs to a new family of antimicrobials known as lypopeptides. Daptomycin has a unique mechanism of action and a potent bactericidal activity over susceptible agents. It is active against a number of clinically significant Gram positive cocci, including strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp., both susceptible and resistant to classic antimicrobials. Daptomycin has been approved for clinical use in skin and soft tissue infections, and for S. aureus bacteremia in adult patients. Ongoing trials suggest that daptomycin is also useful in the treatment of other infections such as osteomyelitis, biofilm producing infections, and in immunocompromised patients, particularly onco-hematologic patients. The main adverse reaction associated with daptomycin use is myopathy, usually mild and reversible.


Daptomicina es un anti-infeccioso de reciente introducción en Chile, miembro exclusivo de una nueva familia de antimicrobianos conocida como lipopéptidos cíclicos. Tiene un mecanismo de acción único que le confiere un potente efecto bactericida sobre los microorganismos susceptibles. Su especto antimicrobiano comprende cocáceas grampositivas de importancia clínica como Staphylococcus aureus y Enterococcus spp., incluyendo cepas resistentes a antimicrobianos habituales. Está aprobada para el uso clínico en infecciones de piel y tejidos blandos y bacteriemia complicada y no complicada por S. aureus, en adultos. Estudios en curso sugieren que será una alternativa útil en otras infecciones frecuentes como osteomielitis, infecciones asociadas a dispositivos ortopédicos, infecciones asociadas a biopelículas e infecciones en hospederos inmunosuprimidos, en particular en pacientes onco-hematológicos. El principal efecto adverso asociado al uso de daptomicina es la toxicidad muscular, observándose miopatía reversible, la mayoría de las veces asintomática, en aproximadamente 3% de los pacientes que utilizan el fármaco.


Subject(s)
Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Daptomycin , Gram-Positive Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/microbiology , Daptomycin/chemistry , Daptomycin/pharmacology , Daptomycin/therapeutic use , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Endocarditis, Bacterial/microbiology , Soft Tissue Infections/drug therapy , Soft Tissue Infections/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL